Stupid Shit. And shit.

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me stuff, but don't be a dick.
banner

dude

what if nintendo is purposely fucking up so much on purpose just so they can make a “grand revival” of their former glory

like, flat out unadulterated new coke style

(oh btw if you don’t get what that means, in the 1980s coca cola came out with “new coke” or “coke 2″, which was very similar to pepsi, and tons of coke fans called foul on it, leading people to think coke did it intentionally so that when they went back to doing things correctly they would massively revitalize a dying interest in the brand)

    • #drunk posting
    • #drunk philosophy
    • #nintendo
    • #coca cola
    • #new coke
    • #because there's no way nintendo is actually this retarded
  • 35 minutes ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

'I hate white people' attack ruled not a hate crime

rightlyconcerned:

southparkconservative:

matt-ruins-feminisms-shit:

Hate crime laws don’t apply to white people. So not only are hate crime laws absolute bullshit they are selectively applied bullshit. Regressives are right there is systemic racism in North America just not against who they think it’s against. For fucks sake a woman can attack a complete stranger and yell I hate white people and they sit around going derr no evidence that race had anything to do with it. These are the same people who think racism is to blame whenever a black person trips over their shoelaces. 

These idiots need to smarten up and quick or the pendulum is going to start swinging the other direction and hard.

Another reason not to continue the obama-clinton-lynch administration.

Wow…

GEE THIS SOUNDS PRETTY FUCKING “INSTITUTIONALIZED” TO ME

Source: sylvestrium

  • 9 hours ago > sylvestrium
  • 238
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Q:Guts once killed a female demon whilst having sex with her, the fact that no other demon killers in fiction ever thought of this proves they can't take one for the team...but Guts? Guts is hardcore, came for the killing, ended up getting poon, and killing.

Anonymous

feels-by-the-foot:

Originally posted by playstationpapi

Guts is probably one of the top badasses ever in fiction.

  • 9 hours ago > feels-by-the-foot
  • 6
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Q:What the fuck is revenge porn

apsalusiv

plebcomics:

its when you take nudes or sexy pictures your (usually) ex has given you in confidence and post them online or give them to porn sites to host

I think the term also applies to incidents (sexual or otherwise) manufactured/spun to appeal to people with deep desires for revenge. Such as many of Tumblr’s “and then the whole train applauded” stories.

  • 1 day ago > plebcomics
  • 40
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
thatalbanianguy:
“ fuckyourguncontrol:
“ invincipletony:
“ fuckyourguncontrol:
“ invincipletony:
“ fuckyourguncontrol:
“ wanderingkat77:
“ If Disney did it and included Marvel, we would have it sorted in a week.
”
Come take em
”
I just love how...
View Separately

thatalbanianguy:

fuckyourguncontrol:

invincipletony:

fuckyourguncontrol:

invincipletony:

fuckyourguncontrol:

wanderingkat77:

If Disney did it and included Marvel, we would have it sorted in a week.

Come take em

I just love how people interpret “gun control” as meaning “gun confiscation” when really “gun control” means placing barriers to obtaining weapons.

People see the words “gun control” and think “the government is going to take my guns away that I’ve already legally purchased,” when really “gun control” means “lets limit access to future purchases to dangerous people,” or “let’s regulate the current carrying rights of individuals and future individuals.“

It’s just ridiculous sometimes to see the level of misinterpretation that spews over.

The conversation always starts at gun control, but eventually they admit they mean confiscation. And those aren’t the only types of control these people speak of, don’t sell yourself out, we’ve given them inch after fucking inch.

I guess if gun control lands in a vacuum, then sure, you might be correct. But I’m unclear of any legitimate (as in serious) attempt of lawmakers trying to pass a law to take your guns away for no other reason than to take your guns away.

A law that says a felon cannot own guns, therefore stripping the felon of his weapons, is not applicable to everyday citizens who’ve done nothing wrong. Or perhaps you believe that a felon should own a gun, and remain ineligible to vote, or have other rights?

Moreover, laws aimed at “no cause” confiscation are a pipe dream for those who believe in it. “Gun control” is not “gun confiscation,” and conflating the two concepts actually diminishes the chances of having a pragmatic conversation around the topic, and around the various problems around it.

I remain fascinated by the somehow synonymous nature, and the overwhelming emphasis on the slippery slope that pushes gun owners into thinking that “regulation” means “confiscation.” When laws are written appropriately, the difference between those two terms remains intact. But I guess laws don’t do anything of any import, right? People still kill people, so why criminalize wrong doers?

We’re not Nazi’s, or Commie’s, of which, without other political and social contexts present, makes gun-rights advocates seem a bit intense and “out there” by suggesting that “all forms gun control” lead to confiscation.

If someone is banning certain types of books from being sold, or being purchased by certain people, is speech being taken away? Abso-fucking-lutely. I see no difference between the two, and it would be stupid as fuck for politicians to plainly admit that, why would they do so?

Felons should not lose any of their rights, this is unconstitutional.

I don’t really care about a “pragmatic” conversation anymore. it’s not about what is smart or reasonable, it about the right to protect myself, nothing more.

We have “compromised” over and over and over again, government is ever expanding and it’s time to stand our ground.

Laws do have ~some~ importance, but when it involves our rights, lawmakers can fuck right off. Criminalizing wrongdoers and criminalizing every citizen are entirely different.

I’m already what would be called extremist, I’ve acknowledged that for some time now. People can think whatever they like about me, or stereotype gun owners because of me. I don’t care, I’m still going to stand for liberty.

The fuck are you talking about when you say its not about confiscation? Fucking Commifornia JUST passed a law outlawing certain magazines and weapons and they are LITERALLY forcing people who currently have them to give them up or destroy them. I mean, for fucks sake, motherfucker, you thought we weren’t watching? Get the fuck out of here with your retarded shit. 

(via rightlyconcerned)

Source: wanderingkat77

  • 2 days ago > wanderingkat77
  • 329
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
ultrafunnypictures:
“ Have a good laugh, mate?
”
Pop-up View Separately

ultrafunnypictures:

Have a good laugh, mate?

(via mr-cappadocia)

Source: ultrafunnypictures

  • 2 days ago > ultrafunnypictures
  • 133
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Top 10 Reasons Why No One Should Be a Feminist

loudlytransparenttrash:

1. The Label - Language is important. What would a movement under a gender biased name like masculism be about? We saw how they reacted when ‘meninism’ was created to show feminism a mirror of themselves. It’s ironic how much they hate what they see. 

So when you have a movement called feminism, it becomes very difficult to engage in an objective dialog about the true nature of things. As you try to have it, any criticism all too easily becomes conflated with attack on the female gender itself. This is used as their greatest advantage.

2. The Incoherent Ideology - Mainstream media tends to portray feminism in a positive and superficial manner as only having the goal to provide equal economic and social opportunities for women. Yet, when you delve deeper into their beliefs, the foremost among them being the patriarchy, the cartoonish and simplistic nature of their intellectual framework is revealed. 

Patriarchy, as a societal system in which male gender is favored, does not exist. All data points to men always having much harder lives; lived shorter, committed suicide 3 to 4 times more often, less educated and less supported, worked the most difficult and dangerous jobs, used as meat fodder in senseless wars (often shamed by women into joining), and are less happy than women. 

Feminist theory of patriarchy is simply a convenient way to disregard biology and evolution as the sole driver of human behavior and, consequently, society.

3. Illusion of Efficacy - If you look at today’s third world countries you will find that it is impossible to liberate women on the same level as their counterparts in western countries. You might have already noticed that western feminists are mum about the plight of women (and men) in such countries, and that they are always far more likely to talk about perceived stereotypes in video games, T-shirts…than anything of real substance. 

This is because feminism was never responsible for the liberation women in western countries, and they are perfectly aware of this. Advances in technology, science, and medicine made certain economic and biological realities unsustainable or irrelevant. 

Women predictably took advantage of this, and men recognized this new reality. There were no feminist theories and gender studies involved in this process. 

4. Making Stuff Up - Feminism is fraught with false assertions masquerading as statistical facts. A couple of big ones:

  • In USA, 22%–35% of women who visit hospital emergency rooms due to domestic violence.
    It turns out that the Justice Department and the CDC were referring to the 40 million women who annually visit emergency rooms, but to women, numbering about 550,000 annually, who come to emergency rooms “for violence-related injuries.” Of these, approximately 37% were attacked by intimates. So, it’s not the case that 22%-35% of women who visit emergency rooms are there for domestic violence. The correct figure is less than half of 1%.

  • One in five in college women will be sexually assaulted.
    The one-in-five figure is based on the Campus Sexual Assault Study, commissioned by the National Institute of Justice and conducted from 2005 to 2007. Two prominent criminologists, Northeastern University’s James Alan Fox and Mount Holyoke College’s Richard Moran, have noted its weaknesses: “The estimated 19% sexual assault rate among college women is based on a survey at two large four-year universities, which might not accurately reflect our nation’s colleges overall. In addition, the survey had a large non-response rate, with the clear possibility that those who had been victimized were more apt to have completed the questionnaire, resulting in an inflated prevalence figure.”Fox and Moran also point out that the study used an overly broad definition of sexual assault. Respondents were counted as sexual assault victims if they had been subject to “attempted forced kissing” or engaged in intimate encounters while intoxicated.

  • Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.
    The 23-cent gender pay gap is actually the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing. It’s illegal for employees to pay women less if they’re doing the identical work with identical experience and qualifications. Do you really believe millions of companies would happily lose millions of dollars by illegally paying men more than women simply because they’re part of a patriarchy? Come on now. 

Why do these fallacious claims have so much appeal and staying power? 

The biggest problem is notorious statistical illiteracy among journalists, feminist academics, and especially politicians. There is also an ingrained human tendency to be protective of women—stories of female exploitation are readily believed, and vocal skeptics risk appearing indifferent to women’s suffering. 

5. Hypocrisy - One sure way to find out that feminism is not about gender equality but female supremacy is to actually listen to what they say. Forget their whole phoney spill about “the definition” of feminism, actually listen to them and watch their actions instead. Let’s look at some:

Feminists skewed the definition of domestic abuse, resulting in only male abusers being arrested and female abusers not. Feminists petitioned to have the government stop prosecuting women for filing false accusations. Feminists successfully made it legally impossible for women to be charged with rape against men. Feminists violently protests against university speakers and shut down events which talks about mens and boys mental issues. 

Mobs of feminists protested, assaulted and abused a group of rosary-praying Catholic men who were peacefully protecting the cathedral in the city of San Juan from threats of vandalism. Feminists shut down forums for battered husbands. Feminists create a law that gives women who kill their husbands lighter sentences if they were victims of abuse but if the man is a victim of abuse and kills his wife he will still face the full sentence. Feminists started a campaign against father’s rights groups. Feminists attempt to put an end to Father’s Day. 

Feminists made it possible for men to be arrested for sitting with their knees too many inches apart from one another. Feminists fought against laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged. Feminists abolish due process for men. 

Feminist protests result in men not even being considered entry into certain university STEM classrooms simply because they’re men. Feminists have forced universities to make any new male student take mandatory classes about “how not to act on their own predatory instincts”. Feminists demand law schools to ban the teaching of rape laws. Feminists demand women students must have safe spaces while men are refused any sort of meeting place. 

Feminists demand that men cannot be feminists, they can only be allies and have no right to speak on feminist issues. Feminists attacks male cartoonist and are hailed a hero of feminism. Feminists try to shut down women’s prisons, believing only men should be locked up. Feminists continually protest against funding for mens shelters, making it impossible for any mens shelters to be created. Feminist even threatened to kill a woman for suggesting men need shelters. 

Feminists protest and shut down meetings about male suicide. Feminists demand the government does not assist unemployed men. Feminists launch anti-men campaigns. Feminists create propaganda video of masked women killing men. Feminists laugh and cheer on women who have beat, abused, humiliated and even mutilated their boyfriends/husbands. 

But yes, feminism is “all about equality of the sexes. It’s as much for men as it is for women.” 

6. Dogmatic, Anti-scientific Hegemony - When other women raise scholarly objections to countless inaccuracies, falsehoods, outright foolishness, and misinformation in feminist theories and studies, they are ostracized and attacked, sometimes physically; a behavior reminiscent of a cult, not a movement for gender equality.

Some of the dissenting women who suffered these attacks: Christina Hoff Sommers, Camille Paglia, Wendy McElroy, Elaine Showalter, Erin Pizzey, Elizabeth Loftus.

Further still, they are often branded as tools of the patriarchy or enemy to women.Feminists even try to penetrate hard sciences like biology, chemistry, math, and physics.

In Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, co-authored by Paul R. Gross and Norman Levitt, the attempts verge on lunacy. According to feminists arithmetic word problems are inherently sexist in their content, and hence can only be “liberated” by a feminist perspective. Here is one such example of evil patriarchy:

“Bob is a fireman who makes $40,000 a year. His boss, Fire Chief Larry has advised him that he will be receiving a 5% salary increase next year. What will his new yearly salary be?”

Feminist mathematics would alter fireman to firewoman (or perhaps fireperson); it would change the name Bob to Barbara. It would also alter Larry to Linda.

This is not a joke, they really mean it. Not satisfied at having “liberated” mathematics from its “sexist” shackles, academic feminists have enlightened us about the sexist properties of DNA. Specifically, feminist biochemistry proposes thatDNA is an instrument of male dominance as evidenced by its “master molecule” narrative (McElroy, 1996). There are countless other examples of “scientific contributions” arising from feminist theorists, however, I think you get the general idea.

7. Toxicity between Genders - The feminist movement has created a great deal of confusion and unpleasant atmosphere regarding the permissible dynamics between the sexes. Men and women no longer trust their instincts honed by evolution; instead they seek to adhere to new “feminist” rules of intersexual conduct, as they are highly fearful of being accused of being “sexist pigs” or “tools of the patriarchy”.

Places of business have become highly regulated, and men are now walking on eggshells. Even a simple compliment can be construed as sexual harassment or used as a leverage in advancing one’s career, and sexual contact is ever more increasingly used as a tool for petty revenge.

8. Using the Violence of the State - Feminists want nothing more than to use the state power to skew the justice system in favor of women, from disparity in sentencing for crimes, domestic violence, bizarre divorce and custody laws completely biased towards women, medical research, schooling, and healthcare costs. Counting on other men to do their dirty work has been a huge success for the feminist movement.

9. Victimhood mentality - The problem with modern feminism, is that the patriarchy/male privilege/male oppression of women paradigm fosters a mindset of victimhood. A number of feminists appear to have developed a psychological condition called, victim mentality. 

Modern feminism revolves around a philosophy of hatred of a group of people based on some perceived wrongdoing they committed. The oppression feminists erroneously perceive from men, becomes a self-serving moral justification for virtually any action they deem necessary to further their cause, regardless of the social consequences. 

They become perceptually blind to the immorality of their own actions and dehumanise those they consider to be against them, which is in this case men and anyone who disagrees with them. This is what an “us against them” mentality brings about.

Western women already have the upper hand in education, scholarships and grants, employment, healthcare, government assistance, support programs, protection and shelter, workplace safety, legal rights, due process, life expectancy, exclusion of responsibility, research and charity for women’s issues and social justice immunity. 

Yes all these things are wonderful for women but the point is, how are they still claiming they’re all so badly oppressed and incapable of doing anything in this big bad patriarchal society? How is it exactly that men and even little boys have an almighty privilege and are evil oppressors no matter their lack of wealth or status? And how is hiding in safe spaces, slapping trigger warnings on everything and silencing opposing views with tears and violence empowering women?

As Christina Hoff Sommers says: If western women are oppressed, that would mean western men would have to be the only oppressor class in history who are less educated, more victimized, have disadvantaged legal rights and are shorter lived than those they oppress. They must be the only oppressor class who take on society’s gritty, dangerous, deadly jobs as their oppressed victims excel. 

10. Treating Women as Less Culpable - Let’s stop conflating the toxic, confused ideology of feminism with the equality for female gender. By doing that we are actively infantilizing women.

Women were always treated as less accountable than men in every area of life, while men were viewed as beasts of burden and war. Consequently, statistics clearly show that their life was and is much easier, far more comfortable, and the problems they face are given disproportionate attention and resources by several orders of magnitude.

It is a fact of nature that our sexually dimorphic species creates such fertile ground for women to exploit; the women are wonderful effect clearly demonstrating this.

Let’s, for a change, treat them as adults, so they can stop skewing the whole society in their favor,  so that they can stop with the cartoonish patriarchy, which they use like a stick to get even greater privileges.

For once, instead of letting them blame the imaginary patriarchy for everything wrong in their lives; let’s stop perceiving them as delicate flowers, and start treating them as responsible adults. They were only able to skew the system so perversely because we infantilized them.

Let’s not indulge them when they seek to monetize their manufactured victimhood, and when they seek the equality of results instead of the equality of opportunity.

Goddamn. Brilliantly put.

(via gamer2002)

Source: loudlytransparenttrash

  • 3 days ago > loudlytransparenttrash
  • 405
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

School Calls Cops, Cops Call Child Services on Boy Who Made Harmless 'Brownies' Remark

danguy96:

your-uncle-dave:

tempered-fist:

matt-ruins-feminisms-shit:

- Teacher assumes that by brownies a boy meant brown people

- Calls the cops….calls…the cops. Picked up the phone dialled the police…the police. Told the police to come deal with her student. For saying something they thought was racist. The police.

-Police actually come. I mean those murders and robberies can wait we need to investigate this school child’s comment about brownies.

- Police don’t immediately think what the hell are we doing here, what is happening and refer the “case” to child services. Child services.

- Parents now under investigation.

- Unbelievably there are still people who want the government to be more involved in people’s lives and give them more money.

- My world’s on fire how bout yours?

WHAT IN THE BUTT FUCKING HELL IS THIS????!!

Political correctness is sheer evil.

I checked the article to make sure, and I couldn’t believe that it was actually real.

And this is how the pendulum starts swinging back to the right.

There was promise that this SJW shit would die out this year, maybe this is how it goes out: flailing and fighting.

(via gamer2002)

Source: matt-ruins-feminisms-shit

  • 3 days ago > matt-ruins-feminisms-shit
  • 1013
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Pop-up View Separately
Pop-up View Separately
PreviousNext

ziinogre:

dongstomper:

theory: Ron Perlman is Will Ferrell from a dystopian cyberpunk future

Ron Perlman is either:

- Will Ferrell stung by a hundred bees
- Will Ferrell’s mega evolution

Or Ron Perlman is simply the physical manifestation of Will Ferrell’s inner evil, and are caught in an eternal struggle of life and death, for the universe cannot obey two masters.

(via feels-by-the-foot)

Source: dongstomper

  • 5 days ago > dongstomper
  • 18323
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

ChristianMingle Must Include Gays, Judge Rules

bill-11b:

deadbilly:

I always thought these dating sites were considered private enterprises. Can’t they decide who they allow to join?

You WILL love and appreciate our lifestyle, or else. 

This sort of thing is why I can’t support LGBT activism despite being LGBT myself. This is just bullying. LGBT activism is becoming the next Black Lies Matter.

(via feels-by-the-foot)

Source: ml-pnp

  • 5 days ago > ml-pnp
  • 682
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

I must be the only person I know in real life who thinks that Rogue One seems and looks like it’ll be boring as shit.

Did lots of people actually want so badly a whole goddamn movie about the uninteresting pawns of the war instead of the magic space wizards and dashing bounty hunters?

Can Disney please just let A New Hope breathe, and not sponge off of it constantly for writing movies?

    • #star wars
    • #rogue one
  • 5 days ago
  • 1
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
sexoentrecoalas:
“ ora
”
Girl JoJo
Pop-up View Separately

sexoentrecoalas:

ora

Girl JoJo

(via feels-by-the-foot)

Source: sexoentrecoalas

  • 6 days ago > sexoentrecoalas
  • 1554
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

pax-britannica:

priceofliberty:

banana-nut-crunch:

Petition for people under 30 to have their votes count for 1.5 votes while over 30s count for 1

petition to stuff this person in a locker until they’re 30

All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.

Or the youths could actually TURN UP AND VOTE.

Brexit in particular was one of the lowest youth vote turnouts, with only like 30 percent of the eligible 18-24 year old voters showing up. Fuck you @banana-nut-crunch, get off your ass and vote.

(via mechfan666)

Source: banana-nut-crunch

  • 1 week ago > banana-nut-crunch
  • 1772
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

badsjw:

Why is hating pulp frowned upon? Yes, I hate pulp. No, I’m not a pussy. No, my orange juice isn’t “less pure”.

Don’t worry - they’re probably the same types of assholes who put mayonnaise and/or ketchup on eggs. That’s how you know their breakfast opinions literally mean nothing.

  • 1 week ago > badsjw
  • 86
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Q:You certainly go out of your way to defend white people for someone who is not

psilocybinaut

dangerbooze:

ummquestion:

You certainly go out of your way to demonize white people for someone that is one…

Originally posted by ba1n3s

And @psilocybinaut certainly goes out of his way to insult a PoC and undermine their heritage for being white himself.

Source: ummquestion

  • 1 week ago > ummquestion
  • 50
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Page 1 of 204
← Newer • Older →

About

Avatar Trigger Warning: I talk about things that might bother some of you. There's my warning. Political Correctness dies here.
Name: Moose (well that's my nickname but I'm not putting my real name here lol)
Location: North Carolin'r, United States
White/Cis/Bi...
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me stuff, but don't be a dick.
  • Mobile
Effector Theme — Tumblr themes by Pixel Union